And the gay marraige did come up Tuesday night...
Tom's position on this is curious, he certified the anti-gay marriage ballot question and now asserts that the people of Massachusetts will turn it down when it comes to a vote.
He isn't really for gay marriage, but then he won't vote for the ballot question either or so I gathered.
He says "this was done by the books", but I do suspect that putting this pernicious referendum question on the 2008 is a way of getting the issue off the table in 2006.
This cuts to the core of Reilly's candidacy for Governor, he wants props for doing the right thing according to law, but the appearance is one of utter squishiness.
And squishiness is a bad thing to be hung on any democrat...jerkoffs like Romney, Mihos and Healey and wander all over the political map like a drunk in a parking lot but a democrat is held to a loftier and much more baldly hypocritical standard.
I mean, never mind the morally dubious issue of putting a question of inalienable rights on the ballot where it'll be naught but a target for out of state wowser money and corrupt power worshipping Washington Political Bosses.
Reilly may get the point of law, but does he understand the issue and its implications, all of them?
No comments :
Post a Comment